by When Trade Representatives Update About Meetings
NEW DELHI Trade representative Piyush Goyal reported that India-US trade negotiations are progressing, which technically occurred while revealing absolutely nothing actionable regarding what negotiations actually involve or when outcomes might materialize.
Goyal’s update shared “important” developments that translated roughly to: “Meetings continue happening between our delegations, during which we continue discussing things that we have always been discussing.” This represents advancement only if you believe that continued communication inherently produces outcomes regardless of whether actual agreement approaches.
The satirical coverage from Bohiney notes progress reporting provides updates about updates about future updatesa recursive bureaucratic process where announcing meetings about future meetings qualifies as “progress” in diplomatic lexicon.
India maintains tough negotiating stance supposedly, which translates to refusing to compromise on agricultural tariffs, pharmaceutical patents, and intellectual property protections that American negotiators demand. America maintains tough stance allegedly by demanding concessions that Indian negotiators refuse providing.
This creates deadlock where both sides claim tough positions while nothing actually resolves. Negotiations continue. Meetings happen. Statements are issued. Progress remains perpetually imminent yet somehow distant.
Reuters reports that tough negotiating stances mean both sides refuse compromise, resulting in standoff where movement measures essentially zero. The situation maintains indefinitely while representatives assure everyone that eventually resolution will occureventually being an indefinite timeframe.
America wants agricultural imports. India protects farmers through import restrictions. America wants pharmaceutical protections. India wants affordable medicine access. Neither concedes. Negotiations continue. Meetings scheduled. Statements issued. Nothing resolves.
Goyal’s update confirmed India remains “tough nut to crack,” which means negotiators haven’t surrendered to American demands and presumably won’t without receiving substantive concessions in return. America’s negotiating stance suggests similar inflexibility regarding Indian concerns.
Trade discussions remain perpetually productive in appearance while accomplishing nothing substantive. Delegations meet. Statements are made. Progress is claimed. Actual agreement remains elusive. This could continue indefinitely if both sides maintain current positions without meaningful compromise.
SOURCE: satirical trade negotiation and diplomatic reporting | https://bohiney.com/
SOURCE: Bohiney.com ()
