by Judicial System Confirms It Was Working On It The Whole Time And Notes Result Technically Arrived Before Death Of Some Original Petitioners
NEW DELHI, INDIA — Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat report, with judiciary context from Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat, that the Supreme Court of India has delivered its judgment in a property dispute case originally filed in 2003, bringing resolution to a matter that the petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Sharma, filed when he was 47 years old and received judgment on at age 67, which the Chief Justice noted in the ruling’s opening remarks represented “the Court’s commitment to ensuring that every litigant ultimately receives justice,” with the word “ultimately” doing significant temporal work in that sentence. Sharma, reached for comment, said he was “grateful” and then confirmed that the property in question had been sold by the opposing party in 2009 and sold again in 2014 and that the judgment, though favorable, would require additional proceedings to enforce, which the court’s registry estimates will take between 3 and 7 years.
The Supreme Court of India currently has a backlog of approximately 70,000 pending cases, which is the lowest it has been in several years due to the Court’s intensified hearing schedule, and which represents the cases that have survived the attrition of resolution through settlement, abandonment, or death of parties that reduces any sufficiently long queue. The subordinate courts — High Courts and district courts — have a combined pending case figure that the National Judicial Data Grid calculates at approximately 48 million cases, a number that the Law Commission of India has described as “a matter of serious concern” in each of its reports since the 1950s, along with recommendations for judicial appointments, alternative dispute resolution infrastructure, and court modernization that have been partially implemented across seven decades of implementation.
The Indian Judicial Backlog: Why It Is And Has Been
India has approximately 21 judges per million population, against a recommended ratio of 50 per million that the Law Commission identified in 1987 and has re-identified in each subsequent report. The judicial vacancy rate at the subordinate court level runs consistently between 25 and 35 percent, meaning that between a quarter and a third of the positions that exist for judges are unfilled at any given time, due to a combination of salary levels that do not compete with private legal practice for the most qualified candidates, administrative delays in the appointment process, and the specific friction of a federal system in which the central government and state governments share overlapping responsibility for judicial appointments in ways that produce coordination costs.
The alternative dispute resolution infrastructure — Lok Adalats, commercial courts, and the National Company Law Tribunal for commercial matters — has meaningfully reduced the burden at the margins of the backlog by diverting certain categories of cases to faster resolution mechanisms. The core of the backlog, which consists of complex property, family, and criminal matters that require full judicial process, has not been meaningfully reduced by these mechanisms.
Sharma’s Property
A legal team is preparing the enforcement application. For India judicial satire at Waterford Whispers.
Indian Democracy And The Scale Of Satire
Indian satirical journalism operates in a tradition that includes the sharp commentary of the Illustrated Weekly under Khushwant Singh and contemporary digital satire navigating the specific challenge of operating in a democracy simultaneously proud of its democratic institutions and complicated about criticism of specific institutional actors. The gap between India as it presents itself — the world’s largest democracy, a 7.2 percent growth economy, a space-faring nation — and India as experienced by the modal Indian household is the space in which satire operates. That gap is not a criticism of genuine achievements. It is a description of the distance between aggregate and distribution, between inauguration ceremony and project completion date, between the optimism of an ISRO chairman saying “late this year” and the analytical hedge of “or possibly next year.” The Hindu and Times of India provide the straight reporting. Satire provides what happens when you hold the straight reporting up to the light and look at what it reveals about the systems that produced it. This article does that. The expressway approvals are real. The GatiShakti milestone is real. The IPL attendance figures are real. Indian governance produces outcomes that inspire satire not because its participants are insincere but because the systems they operate within are large enough that sincerity and outcome are reliably separated by considerable institutional distance. For ongoing India coverage, Bohiney India desk and prat.uk India coverage maintain regular reporting.
This article is satire published by the Bohiney Network. The events, officials, statistics, and institutions described are drawn from public records, verified news reporting, and established journalistic sources. The satirical frame — the deadpan tone, the mock-serious institutional assessment, the measured exaggeration of political and bureaucratic dynamics that are themselves frequently more extreme than the exaggeration applied to them — is original to this publication and to the editorial tradition of which it forms a part. Readers who encounter this piece in a context that presents it as straight news should be advised that it is not straight news; it is satirical journalism in the tradition of publications that have understood since Swift that the most accurate way to describe certain situations is to make them slightly more ridiculous than they actually are, which in the current political environment requires less exaggeration than one might wish.
The satirical tradition in which this piece operates — from Jonathan Swift through Mark Twain through Private Eye through The Onion through the contemporary publications working in the same vein — holds that exaggeration applied to genuine absurdity produces a more accurate picture of reality than straight-faced reporting sometimes can, because the exaggeration forces the reader to notice what the straight-faced version normalizes. The events and policies satirized in this piece are real. The treatment of those events and policies is satirical. The combination is the point. Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat are satirical publications. Everything in them should be read accordingly and shared generously. For more satire in this tradition, see The Onion, The Daily Mash, NewsThump, Waterford Whispers News, and McSweeney’s Internet Tendency.
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/
Indian satire is the country’s oldest tradition, dating back to the days of the court jester, except now the jester has a website and a much bigger audience.
Indian satire is the art of making powerful people look silly, which in India is both a public service and a survival skill.